Luiz Eloy Terena left his Indigenous village in Brazil as a child, thinking he would study education or biology and return someday to help his community. He was partly right. Terena became a lawyer with doctoral degrees in social anthropology, sociology, and law, and now serves as legal adviser to the Brazilian Indigenous Peoples Association. Terena, 34, a well-known advocate for Indigenous rights in Brazil, took part in a Wednesday panel on illegal mining in the Amazon, and its effects on public health, the environment, and Indigenous rights sponsored by the David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies. The Gazette spoke to Terena via Zoom last week about his work, the effects of climate change, fires, deforestation, and illegal mining on the Amazon, and the challenges for Indigenous rights in Brazil. He spoke in Portuguese from Campo Grande, capital of the state of Mato Grosso do Sul.

Q&A

Luiz Eloy Terena

GAZETTE: How did you decide to become a lawyer?

TERENA: I was born and raised in the village of Ipegue in Mato Grosso do Sul. At that time in my village, school was only up to fourth grade. My mother wanted us to continue our education, and the only way to do that was by leaving our village. She moved to the city of Campo Grande to work as a domestic, and we went with her. After I finished high school, I went to college. I’m part of a generation of Brazilian Indigenous youth who were able to go to college thanks to affirmation action policies promulgated by former President Lula da Silva.

My goal was always to go back to my village. I originally wanted to study education or biology, but I was influenced by my sister, who wanted to become a lawyer. When I began working on cases representing Indigenous communities and fighting for our rights, I found my calling.

“Protecting the Amazon is a global responsibility, not only the responsibility of those who live there.”
— Luiz Eloy Terena

GAZETTE:  You’ve been working as an Indigenous lawyer in Brazil for 10 years. What have been the gains for the Indigenous movement in that decade?

TERENA: In those years, there have been struggles, but also many accomplishments. I have represented the Terena, the Guarani-Kaiowá, the Kadiwéu, and the Kinikinau tribes in the courts, which has been a major achievement for Indigenous people. For many years in Brazil, Indigenous people were not autonomous because they were under “tutelage” of a federal agency, the National Indian Foundation. Indigenous communities with legal complaints had to be represented by that entity in the courts. It was only when the Brazilian Constitution of 1988 recognized Indigenous people as autonomous that we could represent ourselves and fight for our rights in the courts. In 2013, I represented an Indigenous community against a group of fazendeiros, or farmers, who were planning an auction to fund a private militia to “protect” their farms. We know that many of those private militias often killed Indigenous leaders who were trying to protect their ancestral lands. In a historic ruling, the courts sided with the Indigenous plaintiffs and declared that the auction was illegal.

In 2020, as a legal adviser for a coalition of Indigenous organizations in Brazil, Articulacao dos Povos Indigenas do Brasil, I filed a petition before the Supreme Court of Brazil asking the government to adopt measures to protect Indigenous communities from COVID-19. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of us, and that was the first time an Indigenous lawyer had been served a favorable ruling by the Supreme Court of Brazil. It has been crucial for Indigenous people to litigate in the courts exercising their rights as autonomous people.

GAZETTE: What is the state of Indigenous rights in Brazil?

TERENA: In Brazil, when we talk about Indigenous rights, we are talking about land rights. All the other rights to health, education, etc., originate from the rights to our ancestral lands. Since the time when Brazil was conquered by the Portuguese in 1511, norms to protect the rights of Indigenous peoples have existed on paper, but they have never been enforced. In the name of progress, Indigenous rights have always been violated. The 1988 Constitution reaffirmed Indigenous peoples’ original right over the land they traditionally occupied, but very little was done in real life. As of now, there are many cases of land demarcation in courts yet to be resolved. Hundreds of Indigenous communities were expelled from their lands during the military dictatorship [1964-1985] and are now in hands of agribusiness companies. Brazil is signatory of international treaties that protect Indigenous peoples’ rights, but neither the Constitution nor the treaties are respected. In the last 30 years, there has been a concerted effort to restrict Indigenous peoples’ land rights by groups tied to agribusiness and cattle and soybean producers. They argue that according to the Constitution, only lands that were occupied by Indigenous people in 1988 can be recognized as Indigenous land. We argue that the rights of Indigenous people are original and precede 1988. 

GAZETTE: How big is the Indigenous population in Brazil and what are their main challenges?

TERENA:  According to the Census of 2010, there are 830,000 Indigenous people. They belong to 305 different communities, and they speak 274 languages. There are 114 groups which live in isolation, but the numbers may be higher. For us, the most urgent problem is the lack of both demarcation and protection of Indigenous territories; some lands have been demarcated, but they are not protected. Many of our lands have been invaded by garimpeiros, illegal gold miners, soy farmers, cattle breeders, and illegal loggers. The situation has worsened with the government of Jair Bolsonaro, who has shown no regard for Indigenous rights. The other big problem is racism against Indigenous people in Brazil. There are several cities in the interior of Brazil where Indigenous people are harassed, mistreated, and killed.

A positive change is that the number of Indigenous people in universities has increased due to affirmative action policies, but there are still many challenges: alcoholism, drug addiction, sexual abuse, and suicide among young people.

GAZETTE: What are the effects of climate change on the Amazon and Indigenous people’s lives?

TERENA: Indigenous peoples face the effects of climate change every day. We are called the guardians of the forest, but we can’t be expected to carry that burden just by ourselves. As Davi Kopenawa, a shaman and leader of the Yanomami people, has said, “We don’t know for how long more we can hold up the sky.” The Amazon is being threatened by climate change, but also by illegal gold mining, deforestation, illegal logging, and by the lack of demarcation of Indigenous lands.

The Amazon is important for the planet, but for us, Indigenous people, the Amazon is our home, our mother. It’s the home of our ancestors and the place where our spirituality and strength come from. In the last few years, we have seen several Indigenous people in the Amazon going extinct because when the last member of an Indigenous community dies, their language and culture die as well. We want to protect it, but we can’t do it alone. The future for both Indigenous peoples and humanity is at stake. Protecting the Amazon is a global responsibility, not only the responsibility of those who live there.

Written by : Stephen Kovach

Stephen is the former CIO and current CEO of Global Advisers, LLC, an investment and wealth management based in Philadelphia, PA. He is a member of the CFA Institute and the CFP Board, and founder of GlobalHumanRights.com, a non-profit organization that conducts primary research on global issues pertaining to human rights violations.

He graduated from Harvard with both undergraduate and graduate degrees in Government. He also completed an Undergraduate Advanced Diploma in Local History at the University of Oxford, England, and he studied Business Analytics, Economics for Managers, and Financial Accounting at the Harvard Business School.

Subscribe To My Newsletter

BE NOTIFIED ABOUT BOOK SIGNING TOUR DATES

Donec fringilla nunc eu turpis dignissim, at euismod sapien tincidunt.